Archive for the ‘Children’s Books’ Category

No To Age Banding on Books

June 9, 2008

On last Saturday’s Guardian Books Online Phillip Pullman wrote a piece regarding his concerns over age banding books. Specifically it detailed his complete objection to the idea that the publisher puts a suggested reading age on any of his books.

When I sit down to write a book, I know several things about it: I know roughly how long it will be, I know some of the events in the story, I know a little about some of the characters, I know – without knowing quite how I’ll get to it – what tone of voice I want the narrative to be cast in.

But there are several things I don’t know, and one of those is who will read it. You simply can’t decide who your readership will be. Nor do I want to, because declaring that it’s for any group in particular means excluding every other group, and I don’t want to exclude anybody. Every reader is welcome, and I want my books to say so. Like some other writers, I avoid giving the age of my characters for that reason. I want every child to feel they can befriend them.”

In fact, his objection is so strong that he’s joined with Anne Fine and Adèle Geras to set up NoToAgeBanding.org. I’ve signed up for it and I’d encourage you to do the same.

As an ex-retailer, as a parent and as a reader I object to being told by the publisher what is suitable for my reading pleasure. I’d rather be the judge of that. And when it comes to Molly, I’d rather the pair of us decided what is suitable for her to read. She does it very easily and very simply. She makes a reasoned, informed decision and tries things out. And critically, we talk about books, about what she’s reading, about the world and about anything she’s interested in.

I was involved a little while ago in a debate at my Teaching assistant’s course when the tutor expected us to decide which books were suitable. I was not pleased and made my point quite forcibly. This is just the same.

When I was young I devoured the shelves of Dudley children library, emptying them of everything I wanted to read. So it was onto the adult section and the delights of the Science Fiction, crime, thriller and fiction shelves I found there. There was just one incident when I was challenged over it. One librarian decided I was too young to be in the adult library and refused to check out my pile of books. Luckily I was meeting Dad there. Even more lucky was the fact that my dad believed in reading. And he believed, just as I do today, that age is no indicator of reading level. He complained and I was immediately given an adult library card, signed by us both. But if these horrible age banding proposals were in place it may have been different. All it takes is one librarian or bookseller having a bad day, one manager getting too officious, one edict from head office following some stupid complaint from a parent and I could have been turned away. And why? Because some committee somewhere has decided that this book is suitable for this age and unsuitable for that age.

The more I think about this, the more it annoys me. It’s so blatantly wrong to force children’s reading habits into nice age categories at the point of contact. Like Pullman said, it’s one thing for a bookseller or Librarian to suggest, to selectively shelve, to discuss with a child or their parents about what book choices they may have. This is an informed and sensible way of doing it. A poor reader aged 12 may be perfectly happy with a book that a better reader may have read at age 6. Similarly an intelligent, literate, mature 10 year old could easily be reading books that many 16 year olds or even adults would be usually reading. It has nothing to do with age ratings. It has everything to do with a child given a suitable book after a reasoned decision is made. And it doesn’t have to be someone making it for the child either. I’ve seen Molly do exactly the same thing. She’ll pick up a book or graphic novel and she’ll make a reasoned decision on it’s suitability. Because we talk to her, because we educate her, because we trust her, because of all of these things we’re fostering a love of reading that will hopefully stay with her for life.

Easter Holidays – a day in Pocklington & a Dr Seuss movie…

March 25, 2008

After the Easter long weekend with all three of us around it was a Daddy and Molly day today. Still not feeling great physically so I’d planned a nice, easy day.
First up, round Pocklington, take in the market and get junior snapper to take some pictures. Must get her a camera for her birthday – I think she’s got a much better eye for it than I have for taking photos.


Then off for Horton Sees A Who at York pictures.
Now normally we’d go and see stuff at Pocklington Arts Centre, but it’s got the water Horse on this week for the kids and neither of us fancied it that much. But Horton seemed a safe couple of hours of entertainment.
And it was. Nothing spectacular, nothing mind-blowing, just a pretty decent version of a great Dr Seuss book which I’ve always loved. Of course the book is better, but it was always going to be.

The Golden Compass……

January 4, 2008


On Wednesday Molly & I headed off to the wonderful Pocklington Arts Centre to partake in a bit of The Golden Compass.

It was meant to be a birthday treat for us. (interesting that – how Molly always manages to make my birthday treat turn into a treat for us). But various house problems meant that we spent a while today waiting for electricians to show up. They did. Eventually.

Anyway, the film was good. Or at least as good and satisfying as a completely incomplete film could be. Even Molly, who hasn’t read the Pullman book, turned to me at the end as Lyra gives a to camera to-do list (Go North, Help Lord Azrael, defeat evil, find out about dust, etc etc) and asked if that was it.
And it was. The story is that Hollwood didn’t think that the downbeat ending to book 1 suited a big Hollywood movie and simply decided not to use the last three chapters. I hear that it will be used as the start of the second movie.
Whether or not this is a good idea is up for debate. I hear Pullman thinks it’s okay, acknowledging that films have to be structured as films, rather than novels.
But what is a problem is the way a pretty good, entertaining movie is simply brought to a grinding halt. It just felt completely wrong. Shame.

We await film 2. I wonder what the hell they’ll call that?